If I was the judge the first thing I would ask you is why you object. Thisis a serious question ( not a snarky one) the court will expect you to articulate why it is the child's lief will better for your presence in it. This isn't about you, but about the child. You have a lot of weight in court beingte natural father, but it owuld seem you voluntarily abrogated your parental rights by abandoning this child. Now wfter someoen else stpped up and has taken care of hte child while you were fussing fleeing fightin and not supporting him, you come around and want to visit. The scales of justice have to be tipped. on one hand you are the natural father ( a bid weight on one side) and on the other is all of the above behavior and I should add, by your own admission the only reason you are paying now is to avoid jail not to support your child.
Every court has their own views on the evidence required to adversirly terminate a parents right sto their own child. Arguably the most serious event in domestic courts. In fact some courts de facto raise the standard from clear and convincing to beyond a reasonable doubt before terminating parents rights to their own flesh and blood.
You will have to really think about if you want to interfere at this stage of this child's life. the bottom line is : is he going to be better off with you or without you.
The testimony of all parties will be what the court uses to decide.



