Welcome New User! ( Create Account | Sign In )

Answer Questions and Earn Money! Join Us

Start earning today!

 
Congratulations!
Brvtvs

Brvtvs

Authority (489)

Brvtvs answer was awarded and will earn ongoing royalties from this thread.

How This Works?

 
Question

Submitted 128 days ago...

Ddegrote84

Ddegrote84

Beginner (73)

Are we living in a simulated reality?

If our reality can be summed up by our brain interpreting particles of light, can we conclude that our reality is "simulated"? Are objects really tangible, or are they a relationship between the observer and the observed? How can we know for sure we aren't in the matrix?

Share | Abuse |
 
Answers

Awarded Answer (What’s This?)

Answer 1 / 3 - Submitted 128 days ago...

Brvtvs

Brvtvs

Authority (489)

The matrix is just science fiction, but I believe we're living in a pseudo-simulated reality of our own making. More specifically, we imagine the world in varying degrees the way we want it to be and deny evidence that conflicts with our hopes, dreams, and illusions. The script is written by participants in the dominant cultural paradigm and reinforced through repetition.

One good example is the discrepancy between real wealth as measured by physical resources and notional wealth as measured by funds on deposit or debt held by institutions. Notional wealth is useful as a medium of trade for real wealth, but its usefulness disappears quickly once faith in its efficacy erodes, which has occurred to various national currencies and is poised to happen again -- perhaps first with the euro. Notional wealth works for as long as enough people subscribe to its value, but as they say, you can't eat gold.

Some philosophers and neuroscientists argue that phenomenology and human emotion aren't real because they're not tangible, but the arguments that support position are swept aside pretty quickly by observing, for example, the very real effect of physical pain in response to stimuli. The experience is "in here," not "out there," but no less real for that fact. Additionally, the coherence of physical objects may break down at the atomic and subatomic levels, but a quick hand upside the head should convince anyone that objects and forms are real enough at our level of physical embodiment for us to pay them heed.

There is in fact an intricate relationship between the object and the observer, but we're in a poor position to describe it. That's because we're all within our reality and can't describe it from outside. The observer influences the observed and in fact participates in its existence to some degree, but if the relationship exists on a quantum level or some other esoteric instantiation of physical reality, our particular perceptual apparatus is far too rudimentary to grasp it fully.

 
Answer 2 / 3 - Submitted 127 days ago...

mikejhca

mikejhca

Brain (2,451)

I do not think you can call it simulated reality. It is reality. There are some theories out there that say things are not the way we perceive them to be. However that does not really matter. It does not make our reality simulated.

Share | Link | Abuse
 
 
Answer 3 / 3 - Submitted 127 days ago...

cosmas

cosmas

Expert (732)

This idea has been explored by various philosophers and thinkers and is often called 'the brain in the vat'. We could just be a 'disembodied' brain in a vat wired up to a simulated reality and we wouldn't know that. Descartes proposed the idea of an evil demon who is 'deceitful' and 'powerful' and whose intent is to mislead and present a complete illusion. In Indian religions the Maya illusion revolves around the idea that we do not experience the world but a projection of it. Maya is a god like deity who controls the illusion of reality and the goal of enlightenment is to understand this. In Plato's cave allegory, Plato describes a group of chained people facing a blank walls.There is a fire behind them and they see shadows of things passing in front of the fire. This becomes the prisoners view of reality. Philosopher Nick Bostrom also examined the idea of a simulated reality and one of his arguments is that a person inside the simulated reality wouldn't know they were inside a simulation, for them this would be the 'real' world. The ultimate question then would be is there one simulation for all or many individual simulations?

Share | Link | Abuse
 
 

This Question was awarded 127 days ago therefore you can no longer post an Answer. However you may post a comment below.

 
Comments
Submitted 127 days ago...

Ddegrote84

Ddegrote84

Beginner (73)

What i was looking for was that you can't solve a problem on the level in which it was created.

Share | Link | Abuse
 
 
 
 
 

Add A Comment

Email Subscriptions
Author adds clarification
All new responses

Related Questions