Well placement of a stent requires putting a catheter into the coronary artery, so it makes sense that you are trying to double bill. Surely, your associates must know this. Why don't you take it up with them?
Welcome New User! ( Create Account | Sign In )
| You are here: Home Categories Health & Fitness Is it approprate to bill the 93508 (Catheter placement in coronary artery(s), angiography without left heart c... |
This Question has not been awarded yet.
Question
Submitted 360 days ago...
Is it approprate to bill the 93508 (Catheter placement in coronary artery(s), angiography without left heart catheterization along with 92980(stent)
We are continuing to get denials for insurance companies when billing the 93508 with 92980- 92984. The denail reason is included in the 92980. I have check the coding companion and it does not list the 93508 as a CCI edit to the 92980-92984.
I have received some information back regarding this denial from one of the commercial carriers stating this information was issued by the American College of Cardiology guidelines.
I am trying to get clearification on weather to bill or not to bill the 93508 with 92980-92984?
Answers
Answer This Question Now
Is it approprate to bill the 93508 (Catheter placement in coronary artery(s), angiography without left heart catheterization along with 92980(stent)
If your Answer is chosen as the “accepted” answer, you will earn ongoing royalties on
this thread.
Simply type your Answer in the box below and post your answer.
Related Questions
Overview |
FAQs |
Contact Us |
Member Agreement |
Privacy Policy |
Site Map |
Partners
Copyright © WebAnswers 2009. All rights reserved.
