The thought of that just scares attorneys to death. Are you pro se? Why do you want to do this foolish thing?
Submitted 115 days ago...
Awarded Answer (What’s This?)
Answer 1 / 1 - Submitted 115 days ago...
This Question was awarded 115 days ago therefore you can no longer post an Answer. However you may post a comment below.
Thank ou for your prompt ans. I thought it might be of help for the trustee to meet a person rather than a pile of papers...
From the reply "I guess not" I am not sure why but I take your candid ans. for it.... Thank you sooo much for your assistance.
Well, common sense would make you think so; and for the record, I think you are correct. People should see people as people and not a batchof papers. The trustees, both court appointed and federal, should meet teh debtor. But remember , this is an adversarial proceeding, no onei syour friend but your attorney; though it is not as rough as chapter 7, it is still "pins and needles" thanks to those that have secreted assets, disposed of asets, and otherwise tried to pull the wool over the courts eyes. As a result, many truistees trust no one. In fact the mosre honest you are , the more trouble you can get in; because you are naturally candid. Some people can take a crumb and turn it into a loaf. I had client once that had a junk car body on their farm they didn't mention soley because it had no value. That turned into a big deal, and the trustee even had it appriased. it turned out it was worth 50$, and the trustee dutifully added it to the asset sheet. So you see what I mean. Besides, if you have representation, the trustee cannot meet with you without counsel.
Thank you for the vote, and this will be a memory after 5 years/
Add A Comment