What did the Supreme Court have to say in the case Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assn. v. State Farm,463 U.S. 29, 103 S.Ct.2856(1983)

The holding further affiremd the "rational basis" standard of review for adminstrative review; and that the agency violated the APA, in that their recission of ( passive restraints; et al) was "arbitrary and capricious" and should "...an agency changing its course must supply a reasoned analysis HOWEVER this Court stated :"We do not require today any specific procedures which NHTSA must follow. Nor do we broadly require an agency to consider all policy alternatives in reaching decision. "

and there were 4 dissenst that thought the agency explianed their reasoning quite enough.
At least that is what I got out of it.